Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC is pleased to announce that 9 lawyers have been selected for inclusion in the 2022 Edition of The Best La...Read More
We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.
The Michigan Open Meetings Act requires that all “deliberations” of a public body constituting a quorum of its members take place in a public meeting and that all “decisions” of the public body must take place in an open meeting. There are limited exceptions, such as a social or chance gathering or conference.
The Michigan Court of Appeals addressed a similar situation where members of a public body engaged in a post-meeting discussion. During the post-meeting discussion, the members reviewed financial matters and discussed an upcoming speaker. The Court determined that while these discussions had occurred, there had been no deliberation and no decision by the board members after the meeting. Solom v. Dickinson County Library Board, Michigan Court of Appeals, 2002.
Since it appears that no exception applies, as long as the Fire Board did not deliberate on an issue, such as careful consideration prior to rendering a decision, or render a decision, it did not violate the Open Meetings Act.
Talk to an AttorneyRequest a Consultation
At Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.