Texas Federal District Court Enj...
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MorePhone 517.381.0100
High Contrast
We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.
Not Likely. The Deputy Treasurer and a board or review member appear to be incompatible offices. The Incompatible Offices Act, 556 PA 1978, prohibits a public officer or employee from holding 2 or more incompatible offices at the same time. MCL 15.181(2). The Act establishes a three-part test to determine whether two positions are “incompatible.” If one position: (1) subordinates another position; (2) supervises another position; or (3) causes a breach of duty of public offices, then holding those two positions constitutes an incompatible office and an individual must step down from one of the positions to avoid the incompatibility issue.
The Attorney General, who regularly opines on these issues, has not opined on whether a Deputy Treasurer may also hold a position on the Board of Review. However, the General Property Tax Act, Act 206 of 1893, states: “A member of the township board is not eligible to serve on the board [of review].” MCL 211.28. The Attorney General has opined that because the Deputy Treasurer assists the Treasurer in his or her duties and must step into the Treasurer’s role in the event the Treasurer is unable to perform, the Deputy Treasurer is subject to the same legislation and restrictions as the Treasurer. See Michigan Attorney General Opinion 7198.
Thus, in light of the Attorney General opinion and the Deputy Treasurer’s statutory requirement to fill the role of the Township Treasurer in his or her absence, it appears that the Deputy Treasurer should not be placed on the Township Board of Review.
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MoreA community may penalize ordinance violations through the municipal civil infraction process as provided under Michigan law. MCL 600.8701 et...
Read MoreMany local governments are missing key policies and ordinances that could dramatically improve the general welfare of the community. Far too...
Read MoreAt Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.