Texas Federal District Court Enj...
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MorePhone 517.381.0100
High Contrast
We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.
On October 14, 2020, the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MiOSHA) issued Emergency Rules requiring employers to take certain actions to address (and prevent!) COVID-19 in the workplace. The Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions regarding the validity of Governor Whitmer’s COVID-19 related Executive Orders impacted the current workplace safety rules and, similarly, safety measures for food-selling establishments and pharmacies. The new MiOSHA Emergency Rules track the language of Executive Order 2020-184 very closely.
The Emergency Rules still require employers to adopt a COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan. The plan must include the employee exposure determination. This type of risk assessment was created by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to help employers assess employees’ risk of COVID-19 exposure based on industry and contact with people who have or may have COVID-19. Under Rule 3, an employer must evaluate and categorize job tasks and procedures performed by employees into one of the following categories: lower exposure risk, medium exposure risk, high exposure risk, and very high exposure risk.
o Examples: those working at home or in certain low-population-density office settings.
o Examples: employees working in schools, high-population-density work environments, or high-volume retail settings.
o Examples: licensed health care professionals, nursing home employees, law enforcement, or mortuary workers.
o Examples: health care workers performing intubation on known or suspected COVID-19 patients, laboratory personnel collecting specimen from known or suspected COVID-19 patients, or morgue workers performing autopsies on bodies of people who were known or suspected to have COVID-19 at the time of death.
The COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plan must also include employee exposure prevention measures the employer will take. These measures can include training, providing personal protective equipment, or performing basic infection prevention measures. Employers must also provide employees with appropriate personal protective equipment based on the exposure risk based on current CDC and OSHA guidance.
To the extent that work that cannot be performed remotely, the employer must follow guidelines to keep employees safe.
The rules include industry-specific guidelines similar to those in the Executive Orders for the following industries:
Importantly, if an employee has COVID-19 or exhibits symptoms of COVID-19, employers are required to take measures such as not allowing the employee to come to work, sending the employee home from work, or requiring the employee to work in an isolated location (such as the employee’s home). There is still question regarding the impact of an employee’s negative COVID-19 test and ability to return, an issue that had been the subject of change over Governor Whitmer’s prior Executive Orders. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) recently issued a Gathering Prohibition and Face Covering Order, which should be reviewed carefully if any employees display symptoms, tests positive for COVID-19, or is in close contact with someone experiencing symptoms or who had tested positive.
It is important for employers to continue to provide a safe and clean work environment for all employees. Employers must also continue to comply with county rules regarding COVID-19. For more information, MiOSHA released workplace guidelines. Individual employers should contact their local health department and attorney to ensure compliance with all rules. As always, please contact your attorney at Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC with any questions or concerns.
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MoreA community may penalize ordinance violations through the municipal civil infraction process as provided under Michigan law. MCL 600.8701 et...
Read MoreMany local governments are missing key policies and ordinances that could dramatically improve the general welfare of the community. Far too...
Read MoreAt Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.