Texas Federal District Court Enj...
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MorePhone 517.381.0100
High Contrast
We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.
As of November 14, 2020, the State of Michigan has reported 251,813 cases and 7,994 deaths due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, Robert Gordon Director of the MDHHS announced additional COVID-19 related safeguards through a newly promulgated Gatherings and Face Mask Order (the “Order”) on November 15. The Order contains many updates that concern municipalities, including new restrictions on non-residential gatherings, which will have significant impacts on in-person public meetings. The Order is set to take effect on Wednesday, November 18, 2020, at 12:01 a.m., and remains in effect until December 8, 2020, until 11:59 p.m.
Significant changes under the November 15, 2020 Gatherings and Face Mask Order (“Order”) include heightened restrictions on residential and non-residential gatherings. Under the Order, a “gathering” is defined as “any occurrence, either indoor or outdoor, where two or more persons from more than one household are present in a shared space.” Order, Section 1(e).
The Order places the following restrictions on gatherings:
The Order’s prohibition on indoor nonresidential public gatherings will result in municipalities conducting public meetings using the newly adopted authorization for remote meetings under the Open Meetings Act (“OMA”). On October 16, 2020, the Michigan Legislature amended the OMA to facilitate public bodies hosting remote meetings.
When scheduling electronic public meetings (which we addressed in March and can be viewed here), the newly amended OMA has specific requirements different from a traditional meeting, including the following:
Notably, the Order does not prohibit all “gatherings” for municipalities in their capacity as employers. Nothing in the Order or MIOSHA Emergency Rules requires municipalities to cease providing in-person service to residents for tasks that cannot be feasibly conducted remotely. Order, Section 2(c)(2). Workplace gatherings that occur must have employees socially distanced six feet apart, wearing face coverings, and following all other requirements enumerated in MIOSHA Emergency Rules Issued on October 14, 2020. If a municipality has a concern about a member of their public body not having access to reliable technology, paperwork, or other items located at his or her dwelling to participate in a remote public meeting, the municipality is encouraged to consult with local counsel about granting public body members access to the municipality’s facility as part of a permissible workplace gathering under the MIOSHA Emergency Rules.
In addressing workplace restrictions, the Order reaffirms the existing MIOSHA Emergency Rules Issued on October 14, 2020, which you can learn more about through our October publication. Under the MIOSHA Emergency Rules, all employers must adopt a Preparedness and Response Plan. With many municipal employers adopting a Preparedness and Response Plan under the previous Michigan Governor Executive Orders, we encourage all municipal employers to review their plans to ensure compliance with the MIOSHA Emergency Rules.
One significant requirement from the MIOSHA Emergency Rules is that all employers create a policy governing which employees can work in-person. In its relevant portion, the Emergency Rules state “The employer shall create a policy prohibiting in-person work for employees to the extent that their work activities can feasibly be completed remotely.” MIOSHA Emergency Rules, 5(8). Under this provision, municipalities should consider examining (if not already done) what “work activities can feasibly be completed remotely.”
Many municipalities offer an array of services to their citizens. Below are other pertinent parts of the Order that may impact current services:
As the COVID-19 Pandemic continues to evolve, there is a high probability the State will see new regulations issued by the Legislature, MDHHS, or MIOSHA. As always, the dedicated team at Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, will continue to monitor these updates. As always, please contact your attorney at Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC with any questions or concerns.
Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, Your Township Attorneys, is a Michigan law firm specializing in the representation of Michigan townships. Our lawyers have more than 150 years of experience in township law and have represented more than 150 townships across the state of Michigan. This publication is intended for our clients and friends. This communication highlights specific areas of law and is not legal advice. The reader should consult an attorney to determine how the information applies to any specific situation.
Copyright © 2020 Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC
On December 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order prohibiting th...
Read MoreA community may penalize ordinance violations through the municipal civil infraction process as provided under Michigan law. MCL 600.8701 et...
Read MoreMany local governments are missing key policies and ordinances that could dramatically improve the general welfare of the community. Far too...
Read MoreAt Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.