Our Feed

We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.

Is My Township Required to Have an Open Meetings Act (“OMA”) Policy Even If We Do Not Meet Electronically?

The OMA requires public bodies (including township boards) to establish certain procedures to accommodate the electronic attendance of a member(s) of the public body due to military duty, a medical condition, or a statewide or local state of emergency. These procedures set forth how a township will accommodate the electronic attendance, how the absent member(s) will participate in the meeting electronically, and the method of providing notice to the public about the electronic attendance of the member(s) and how they may contact the member(s). See MCL 15.263(2).

Your township may not intend now or in the future to utilize electronic meetings, but the electronic attendance of board members must be accommodated for the above-stated qualifying reasons. Id.; MCL 15.263a(1). A township board cannot deny an individual member the ability to attend for a qualifying reason. And even though the medical and state of emergency reasons are in effect through the end of 2021, accommodations for military duty are permanent. Further, while the OMA does not explicitly require a written OMA policy, it is the only realistic way to ensure all required procedures are established and followed. A written policy may also set forth additional OMA requirements to ensure full compliance with the Act.

Author

Recent Articles & Announcements

  1. Are municipal cell tower leases ...

    Yes, cell tower leases can generate a steady stream of revenue and, in many cases, have automatic “renewal terms” which, in the aggregat...

    Read More
  2. Where Data Meets Land Use: A Mic...

    communities, considerable apprehension. Local governments and planners are fielding questions from residents, receiving inquiries from devel...

    Read More
  3. Debunking Michigan’s Myth Abou...

    In Plachta v Plachta, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2026) (Docket No. 374260), the Michigan Court of Appeals confirmed what should have be...

    Read More
Talk to an Attorney
Request a Consultation

At Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.