Debunking Michigan’s Myth Abou...
In Plachta v Plachta, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2026) (Docket No. 374260), the Michigan Court of Appeals confirmed what should have be...
Read MorePhone 517.381.0100
High Contrast
We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.
Section 6.4 of Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (“MRTMA”) states “[a] municipality may charge an annual fee of not more than $5,000 to defray application, administrative, and enforcement costs associated with the operation of the marihuana establishment in the municipality.” Many municipalities apply this section of the MRTMA to the application and review process associated with the issuance of a local permit authorizing adult-use license types to operate within the jurisdiction. The statutory language authorizes the fee for an “establishment.” Thus, many municipalities calculate a reasonable fee based on a per license review and issuance (i.e., the fee would be doubled for an applicant seeking a grower and a processor, even if collocated, or similarly for an applicant stacking two grow licenses). Ultimately, municipalities want to ensure that the amount of the fee reimburses the Township for the costs associated with the licensed operation.
In Plachta v Plachta, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2026) (Docket No. 374260), the Michigan Court of Appeals confirmed what should have be...
Read MorePromises to pay are easy to make and notoriously expensive to enforce. Even a straightforward claim can be trapped in months—or years—of...
Read MoreYes. On December 23, 2025, Governor Whitmer signed Public Act 58 of 2025, amending Section 108 of the Michigan Land Division Act (MCL 560.10...
Read MoreAt Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.