Our Feed

We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.

A property owner claims they don’t have to fix building code violations because the building has “always been that way.” Does the nonconforming use doctrine protect them?

Answer: No. The nonconforming use doctrine—sometimes called “grandfathering”—only applies to zoning ordinances, not to building code violations or other municipal regulations. A prior nonconforming use is only permissible if it existed before a zoning regulation’s effective date—and even then, the property owner must offer evidence the property was operated as a “lawful use” before the ordinance was enacted. Building code violations, fire code violations, and similar regulatory requirements must still be addressed regardless of how long the property has been out of compliance. This also means that such code compliance issues can be the obligation of a current owner even if title to the property was acquired from a previous owner.

Recent Articles & Announcements

  1. Does the Board have to respond t...

    No, this is generally something that is up to the Board’s discretion. Michigan’s Open Meetings Act (OMA) only requires that memb...

    Read More
  2. Prosecutorial Discretion vs Sele...

    A common question we get from our clients is whether a township has an obligation to enforce its ordinances. This can be an especially hot t...

    Read More
  3. Spring Cleaning Your Employee Ha...

    Is your employee handbook a legal lifeline, a liability labyrinth, or do you operate with no handbook at all? An outdated handbook is like a...

    Read More
Talk to an Attorney
Request a Consultation

At Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.