Our Feed

We are involved in our communities, our profession, and our clients' associations and activities.

A property owner claims they don’t have to fix building code violations because the building has “always been that way.” Does the nonconforming use doctrine protect them?

Answer: No. The nonconforming use doctrine—sometimes called “grandfathering”—only applies to zoning ordinances, not to building code violations or other municipal regulations. A prior nonconforming use is only permissible if it existed before a zoning regulation’s effective date—and even then, the property owner must offer evidence the property was operated as a “lawful use” before the ordinance was enacted. Building code violations, fire code violations, and similar regulatory requirements must still be addressed regardless of how long the property has been out of compliance. This also means that such code compliance issues can be the obligation of a current owner even if title to the property was acquired from a previous owner.

Author

Recent Articles & Announcements

  1. Can our township adopt an ordina...

    Yes. The new Section 108(6) of the Land Division Act expressly permits local ordinances to exceed the state baseline; there is no numerical ...

    Read More
  2. Land Divisions, Development, and...

    The Problem Is Already Here On December 23, 2025, Governor Whitmer signed Senate Bill 23 into law as Public Act 58 of 2025, amending Michiga...

    Read More
  3. Virginia Bans Post-Term Non-Comp...

    Earlier this month, the State of Virginia amended the Virginia Retail Franchising Act in two ways: (1) Virginia law governs all Virginia fra...

    Read More
Talk to an Attorney
Request a Consultation

At Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC, we’ve been helping municipalities, franchised businesses, employers, and more with their legal needs since 2008. We’d love to learn how we can help you, too.